48 MTR March 2011
ing the risk of contact with electrical potentials exceeding
50V.
Another important requirement is that system architec-
ture may not contribute to the failure of any cell. The first
case to be considered is that no cell may be placed at risk
of overcharge due to the system architecture. This requires
that back-charging or circulating currents must be con-
trolled. For example, if two sets of cells are placed in series
and the strands are connected in parallel without controls,
discharge of some cells in one strand due to self-discharge,
electronics failure, a foreign object, or moisture will result
in the overcharge of the remaining cells in that strand.
Thus, the charge current through each strand of cells must
be controlled to prevent overcharge.
Another guideline within Saft’s system architecture is
that each cell be monitored for overcharge. To address the
critical nature of this requirement, Saft’s standard practice
is to always include a redundant sensing method for each
cell that is communicated over a physical communications
link. The primary and secondary devices use different
technology for both the sensing devices and the commu-
nication links, further reducing the likelihood that a com-
mon failure mode would affect both cells. The detection
of a dangerously high cell voltage by either the primary or
redundant monitoring circuits blocks the charge of that
cell. Some system architectures result in worsening the
effects of cell failure. This is a concern when cells are con-
nected in parallel before being placed in series, or when
cells are connected into a series-parallel matrix with con-
nections both ways. In both of these arrangements, the
presence of a short circuit at one cell, whether caused by
internal short, local heating, crush or penetration, will
result in the parallel-connected cells delivering power into
the short. This can increase the energy released in the fail-
ure, exacerbating the reaction. To prevent this type of cell
failure, the architecture recommended by Saft consists of
single cells placed in series, with the currents of each series
strand managed to prevent contributing to cell failures or
exacerbating failure effects. The mechanical design and
architecture of the battery protects against cell failure
propagation. The effects of a failure of any single cell are
managed to prevent those effects from inducing failures of
other cells within the battery. Saft has successfully demon-
strated propagation prevention in numerous batteries by
integrating key principles into the battery architecture
such as managing vent gasses and thermal characteristics
of the vent gasses. Although future mission requirements
for the U.S. military are unknown, Navy engineers will
continue to partner with battery manufacturers to lever-
age the latest technology. Saft has invested years of
research into developing cutting-edge battery systems to
safely provide the most power, in the smallest package, to
Navy designers. Saft already has a wealth of experience in
the marine industry as a supplier of battery systems for
emergency back-up, lighting, engine starting and other
auxiliary systems. The use of Li-ion batteries for ship and
boat propulsion applications and Super-Phosphate for
UUVs is therefore a natural progression for Saft, based
particularly on its broad expertise in delivering lithium
battery systems for the military and space industries.
About the Author
Alex Bynum is the Defense Sales Manager focusing on naval
applications for Saft’s Space & Defense Division, located in
Cockeysville, MD.
Digital Wave Publishing